Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 2M | 1M |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.50 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $3.00 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.325Alibaba |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $1.95Alibaba |
| — | $163Alibaba | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 72% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 78.8% |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 28.8% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | |
| Release date | Sep 24 2024 | Apr 2 2026 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemini 1.5 Pro-002vsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.6-PlusvsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 1.5 Pro-002vsGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.6-PlusvsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 1.5 Pro-002vsMuse Spark OpenQwen3.6-PlusvsMuse Spark OpenGemini 1.5 Pro-002vsGrok 4.7Qwen3.6-PlusvsGrok 4.7Gemini 1.5 Pro-002vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen3.6-PlusvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemini 1.5 Pro-002vsMistral Large 4Qwen3.6-PlusvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Gemini 1.5 Pro-002 and Qwen3.6-Plus don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Qwen3.6-Plus has a verified first-party API price: $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Gemini 1.5 Pro-002. Gemini 1.5 Pro-002 shipped 555 days before Qwen3.6-Plus, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 2M (Gemini 1.5 Pro-002) vs 1M (Qwen3.6-Plus).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemini 1.5 Pro-002 and Qwen3.6-Plus don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.