Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 1T |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 32k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.57Novita |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $2.30Novita |
| — | $229Novita · fp8 | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 10% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 65.8% |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 4.7% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 75.1% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | |
| Release date | Feb 8 2024 | Jul 11 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemini 1.0 UltravsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi K2vsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 1.0 UltravsGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2vsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 1.0 UltravsMuse Spark OpenKimi K2vsMuse Spark OpenGemini 1.0 UltravsGrok 4.7Kimi K2vsGrok 4.7Gemini 1.0 UltravsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Kimi K2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemini 1.0 UltravsMistral Large 4Kimi K2vsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Gemini 1.0 Ultra and Kimi K2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Gemini 1.0 Ultra shipped 519 days before Kimi K2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 32k (Gemini 1.0 Ultra) vs 128k (Kimi K2). Gemini 1.0 Ultra is closed, while Kimi K2 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemini 1.0 Ultra and Kimi K2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.