DeepSeek V3.2 ExpvsMuse Glimmer
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 30B |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 51.2% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 76% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 51.7% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 75.5% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 22% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 83.5% |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 65.9% |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | — | 953 |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | — | 78.8% |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | — | 74% |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1272 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Release date | Sep 29 2025 | Aug 10 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Which is better: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Muse Glimmer?
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Glimmer don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp shipped 315 days before Muse Glimmer, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Muse Glimmer don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp was released by DeepSeek on Sep 29 2025.
Muse Glimmer was released by Meta on Aug 10 2026.
Other comparisons
DeepSeek V3.2 ExpvsClaude Opus 5Muse GlimmervsClaude Opus 5DeepSeek V3.2 ExpvsGPT-5.6-CyberMuse GlimmervsGPT-5.6-CyberDeepSeek V3.2 ExpvsGemini 3.6 FlashMuse GlimmervsGemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek V3.2 ExpvsGrok 4.5Muse GlimmervsGrok 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 ExpvsMistral Medium 3.5Muse GlimmervsMistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek V3.2 ExpvsKimi K3Muse GlimmervsKimi K3