Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 671B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 1M |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.30 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $2.50 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.03 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.25SiliconFlow | $0.15Google AI Studio |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $1.00SiliconFlow | $1.25Google AI Studio |
| $100SiliconFlow · fp8 | $185Google list price | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 19% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | |
| Release date | Mar 24 2025 | Apr 17 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek V3-0324vsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 FlashvsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V3-0324vsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 2.5 FlashvsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek V3-0324vsMuse Spark OpenGemini 2.5 FlashvsMuse Spark OpenDeepSeek V3-0324vsGrok 4.7Gemini 2.5 FlashvsGrok 4.7DeepSeek V3-0324vsMistral Large 4Gemini 2.5 FlashvsMistral Large 4DeepSeek V3-0324vsKimi K3Gemini 2.5 FlashvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek V3-0324 and Gemini 2.5 Flash don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Gemini 2.5 Flash has a verified first-party API price: $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for DeepSeek V3-0324. DeepSeek V3-0324 shipped 24 days before Gemini 2.5 Flash, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 128k (DeepSeek V3-0324) vs 1M (Gemini 2.5 Flash). DeepSeek V3-0324 is open weight, while Gemini 2.5 Flash is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek V3-0324 and Gemini 2.5 Flash don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.