AI Model Release Tracker

Compare AI models

Specifications
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality.
1.3B/5.7B/6.7B/33B12B
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider.
16k128k
API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page.
—$0.0166Io Net
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input.
—$0.0216Io Net
—$4.40Io Net · fp16
Overview
CompanyDeepSeekMistral
Release dateNov 2 2023Jul 18 2024
AccessOpen WeightOpen Weight
Model detailsView modelView model

Other comparisons

DeepSeek CodervsClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral NeMovsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek CodervsGPT-6.1 SolMistral NeMovsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek CodervsGemini 4 ArgonMistral NeMovsGemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek CodervsMuse Spark OpenMistral NeMovsMuse Spark OpenDeepSeek CodervsGrok 4.7Mistral NeMovsGrok 4.7DeepSeek CodervsKimi K3Mistral NeMovsKimi K3

Frequently asked questions

DeepSeek Coder and Mistral NeMo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek Coder shipped 259 days before Mistral NeMo, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

DeepSeek Coder has 1.3B/5.7B/6.7B/33B parameters, while Mistral NeMo has 12B. Context windows are 16k (DeepSeek Coder) vs 128k (Mistral NeMo).

Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek Coder and Mistral NeMo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.