Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 1.3B/5.7B/6.7B/33B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 16k | 1M |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | |
| Release date | Nov 2 2023 | Feb 5 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek CodervsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek CodervsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek CodervsMuse Spark OpenGemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsMuse Spark OpenDeepSeek CodervsGrok 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsGrok 4.7DeepSeek CodervsMistral Large 4Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsMistral Large 4DeepSeek CodervsKimi K3Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek Coder and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek Coder shipped 461 days before Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 16k (DeepSeek Coder) vs 1M (Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite). DeepSeek Coder is open weight, while Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek Coder and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.