Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 1.3B/5.7B/6.7B/33B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 16k | 1M |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | |
| Release date | Nov 2 2023 | Sep 24 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek CodervsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 1.5 Flash-002vsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek CodervsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 1.5 Flash-002vsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek CodervsMuse Spark OpenGemini 1.5 Flash-002vsMuse Spark OpenDeepSeek CodervsGrok 4.7Gemini 1.5 Flash-002vsGrok 4.7DeepSeek CodervsMistral Large 4Gemini 1.5 Flash-002vsMistral Large 4DeepSeek CodervsKimi K3Gemini 1.5 Flash-002vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek Coder and Gemini 1.5 Flash-002 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek Coder shipped 327 days before Gemini 1.5 Flash-002, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 16k (DeepSeek Coder) vs 1M (Gemini 1.5 Flash-002). DeepSeek Coder is open weight, while Gemini 1.5 Flash-002 is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek Coder and Gemini 1.5 Flash-002 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.