Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 1.3B/5.7B/6.7B/33B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 16k | 1M |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | |
| Release date | Nov 2 2023 | May 14 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek CodervsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 1.5 FlashvsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek CodervsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 1.5 FlashvsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek CodervsMuse Spark OpenGemini 1.5 FlashvsMuse Spark OpenDeepSeek CodervsGrok 4.7Gemini 1.5 FlashvsGrok 4.7DeepSeek CodervsMistral Large 4Gemini 1.5 FlashvsMistral Large 4DeepSeek CodervsKimi K3Gemini 1.5 FlashvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek Coder and Gemini 1.5 Flash don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek Coder shipped 194 days before Gemini 1.5 Flash, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 16k (DeepSeek Coder) vs 1M (Gemini 1.5 Flash). DeepSeek Coder is open weight, while Gemini 1.5 Flash is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek Coder and Gemini 1.5 Flash don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.