Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 16B/236B | 70B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 128k |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Jun 17 2024 | Oct 15 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek Coder V2vsClaude Haiku 5.5Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70BvsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek Coder V2vsGPT-6.1 SolLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70BvsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek Coder V2vsGemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70BvsGemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek Coder V2vsMuse Spark OpenLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70BvsMuse Spark OpenDeepSeek Coder V2vsGrok 4.7Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70BvsGrok 4.7DeepSeek Coder V2vsMistral Large 4Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70BvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek Coder V2 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek Coder V2 shipped 120 days before Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek Coder V2 has 16B/236B parameters, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B has 70B. Context windows are 128k (DeepSeek Coder V2) vs 128k (Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek Coder V2 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.