Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 16B/236B | 400B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 1M |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.1875DigitalOcean |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $0.6525DigitalOcean |
| — | $70.13DigitalOcean | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 29% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Release date | Jun 17 2024 | Apr 5 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek Coder V2vsClaude Haiku 5.5LLaMA 4 MaverickvsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek Coder V2vsGPT-6.1 SolLLaMA 4 MaverickvsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek Coder V2vsGemini 4 ArgonLLaMA 4 MaverickvsGemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek Coder V2vsGrok 4.7LLaMA 4 MaverickvsGrok 4.7DeepSeek Coder V2vsMistral Large 4LLaMA 4 MaverickvsMistral Large 4DeepSeek Coder V2vsKimi K3LLaMA 4 MaverickvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek Coder V2 and LLaMA 4 Maverick don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek Coder V2 shipped 292 days before LLaMA 4 Maverick, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek Coder V2 has 16B/236B parameters, while LLaMA 4 Maverick has 400B. Context windows are 128k (DeepSeek Coder V2) vs 1M (LLaMA 4 Maverick).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek Coder V2 and LLaMA 4 Maverick don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.