Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 16B/236B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 2M |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | |
| Release date | Jun 17 2024 | Sep 24 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek Coder V2vsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 1.5 Pro-002vsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek Coder V2vsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 1.5 Pro-002vsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek Coder V2vsMuse Spark OpenGemini 1.5 Pro-002vsMuse Spark OpenDeepSeek Coder V2vsGrok 4.7Gemini 1.5 Pro-002vsGrok 4.7DeepSeek Coder V2vsMistral Large 4Gemini 1.5 Pro-002vsMistral Large 4DeepSeek Coder V2vsKimi K3Gemini 1.5 Pro-002vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek Coder V2 and Gemini 1.5 Pro-002 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek Coder V2 shipped 99 days before Gemini 1.5 Pro-002, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 128k (DeepSeek Coder V2) vs 2M (Gemini 1.5 Pro-002). DeepSeek Coder V2 is open weight, while Gemini 1.5 Pro-002 is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek Coder V2 and Gemini 1.5 Pro-002 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.