Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3-Codex
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 | OpenAI GPT-5.3-Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Release date | Feb 5 2026 | Feb 5 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 87%Best | 24% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 80.8% | — |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 75% | 83%Best |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 83.7% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 53% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 91.3% | — |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | 1504 | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1543Best | 1406 |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | Released on the same day | |
Which is better: Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.3-Codex?
Claude Opus 4.6 leads GPT-5.3-Codex on 2 of the 3 benchmarks they both report (BullshitBench v2, Next.js Evals, Arena Elo (Code)). Both models were released on the same day — Feb 5 2026.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, Claude Opus 4.6 leads at 87% vs GPT-5.3-Codex at 24%. On Next.js Evals, GPT-5.3-Codex leads at 83% vs Claude Opus 4.6 at 75%. On Arena Elo (Code), Claude Opus 4.6 leads at 1543 vs GPT-5.3-Codex at 1406.
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4.6 was released by Anthropic on Feb 5 2026.
GPT-5.3-Codex was released by OpenAI on Feb 5 2026.
GPT-5.3-Codex leads on Next.js Evals — Claude Opus 4.6 75% vs GPT-5.3-Codex 83%.
Other comparisons
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini OmniGPT-5.3-Codex vs Gemini OmniClaude Opus 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.1GPT-5.3-Codex vs Muse Spark 1.1Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4.5GPT-5.3-Codex vs Grok 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V4-ProGPT-5.3-Codex vs DeepSeek-V4-ProClaude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Medium 3.5GPT-5.3-Codex vs Mistral Medium 3.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT-5.3-Codex vs Kimi K2.7 Code