Compare AI models

Specifications
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality.
—24B
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider.
200k128k
API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page.
$15.00Amazon Bedrock—
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input.
$75.00Amazon Bedrock—
$6,750Amazon Bedrock—
Benchmarks
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better.
74.5%46.8%
Overview
CompanyAnthropicMistral
Release dateAug 5 2025May 21 2025
AccessClosedOpen Weight
Model detailsView modelView model

Frequently asked questions

Claude Opus 4.1 leads Devstral Small on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (SWE-Bench Verified). Devstral Small shipped 76 days before Claude Opus 4.1, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Context windows are 200k (Claude Opus 4.1) vs 128k (Devstral Small). Claude Opus 4.1 is closed, while Devstral Small is open weight.

On SWE-Bench Verified, Claude Opus 4.1 leads at 74.5% vs Devstral Small at 46.8%.