Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 397B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | 1M |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.40 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $1.60 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.32Alibaba |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $1.28Alibaba |
| — | $128Alibaba | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 77.7% |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 89.6% |
Terminal-Bench 4.0Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Version 4.0 recalibrated how much time, CPU and memory each task gets, removed eight tasks and fixed nineteen, so fewer runs fail for reasons that have nothing to do with the model. Scores are not comparable with earlier versions. Higher is better. | 60.9% | — |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 34.7% |
OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | — | 73.3% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Release date | Sep 1 2026 | Jun 1 2026 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude Mythos 5.1vsGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7-PlusvsGPT-6.1 SolClaude Mythos 5.1vsGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7-PlusvsGemini 4 ArgonClaude Mythos 5.1vsMuse Spark OpenQwen3.7-PlusvsMuse Spark OpenClaude Mythos 5.1vsGrok 4.7Qwen3.7-PlusvsGrok 4.7Claude Mythos 5.1vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen3.7-PlusvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude Mythos 5.1vsMistral Large 4Qwen3.7-PlusvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3.7-Plus don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Qwen3.7-Plus has a verified first-party API price: $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude Mythos 5.1. Qwen3.7-Plus shipped 92 days before Claude Mythos 5.1, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Claude Mythos 5.1) vs 1M (Qwen3.7-Plus).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Mythos 5.1 and Qwen3.7-Plus don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.