Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 32B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 100k | 32k |
These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
HumanEvalFunction synthesis — 164 small Python problems: the AI is given a function's description and has to write the working function. This was the coding benchmark of the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 era, before the field moved to fixing real bugs in real repositories. Higher is better. | 58.7% | — |
GSM8KGrade-school math — Grade-school maths word problems that take a few steps of arithmetic to work through. It separated the models of 2022 and 2023 sharply, then saturated. One caveat on the historical numbers: OpenAI included part of the GSM8K training set in GPT-4's pre-training mix, so GPT-4's score is not a clean few-shot result. Higher is better. | 86.7% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Release date | Aug 9 2023 | Nov 28 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude Instant 1.2vsGPT-6.1 SolQwQ-32B-PreviewvsGPT-6.1 SolClaude Instant 1.2vsGemini 4 ArgonQwQ-32B-PreviewvsGemini 4 ArgonClaude Instant 1.2vsMuse Spark 1.3QwQ-32B-PreviewvsMuse Spark 1.3Claude Instant 1.2vsGrok 4.7QwQ-32B-PreviewvsGrok 4.7Claude Instant 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwQ-32B-PreviewvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude Instant 1.2vsMistral Large 4QwQ-32B-PreviewvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Claude Instant 1.2 and QwQ-32B-Preview don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude Instant 1.2 shipped 477 days before QwQ-32B-Preview, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 100k (Claude Instant 1.2) vs 32k (QwQ-32B-Preview). Claude Instant 1.2 is closed, while QwQ-32B-Preview is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Instant 1.2 and QwQ-32B-Preview don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.