Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 74B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 100k | 256k |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
HumanEvalFunction synthesis — 164 small Python problems: the AI is given a function's description and has to write the working function. This was the coding benchmark of the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 era, before the field moved to fixing real bugs in real repositories. Higher is better. | 58.7% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 50.98% |
MCP AtlasMulti-step tool use — Can the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 52.2% |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 66.75% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 86.43% |
GSM8KGrade-school math — Grade-school maths word problems that take a few steps of arithmetic to work through. It separated the models of 2022 and 2023 sharply, then saturated. One caveat on the historical numbers: OpenAI included part of the GSM8K training set in GPT-4's pre-training mix, so GPT-4's score is not a clean few-shot result. Higher is better. | 86.7% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Aug 9 2023 | Oct 15 2026 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude Instant 1.2vsGPT-6.1 SolNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGPT-6.1 SolClaude Instant 1.2vsGemini 4 ArgonNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGemini 4 ArgonClaude Instant 1.2vsMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsMuse Spark OpenClaude Instant 1.2vsGrok 4.7Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGrok 4.7Claude Instant 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude Instant 1.2vsMistral Large 4Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Claude Instant 1.2 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude Instant 1.2 shipped 1163 days before Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 100k (Claude Instant 1.2) vs 256k (Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B). Claude Instant 1.2 is closed, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Instant 1.2 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.