Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 16B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 100k | 128k |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
HumanEvalFunction synthesis — 164 small Python problems: the AI is given a function's description and has to write the working function. This was the coding benchmark of the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 era, before the field moved to fixing real bugs in real repositories. Higher is better. | 58.7% | — |
GSM8KGrade-school math — Grade-school maths word problems that take a few steps of arithmetic to work through. It separated the models of 2022 and 2023 sharply, then saturated. One caveat on the historical numbers: OpenAI included part of the GSM8K training set in GPT-4's pre-training mix, so GPT-4's score is not a clean few-shot result. Higher is better. | 86.7% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | Aug 9 2023 | Apr 10 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude Instant 1.2vsGPT-6.1 SolKimi-VLvsGPT-6.1 SolClaude Instant 1.2vsGemini 4 ArgonKimi-VLvsGemini 4 ArgonClaude Instant 1.2vsMuse Spark OpenKimi-VLvsMuse Spark OpenClaude Instant 1.2vsGrok 4.7Kimi-VLvsGrok 4.7Claude Instant 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Kimi-VLvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude Instant 1.2vsMistral Large 4Kimi-VLvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Claude Instant 1.2 and Kimi-VL don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude Instant 1.2 shipped 610 days before Kimi-VL, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 100k (Claude Instant 1.2) vs 128k (Kimi-VL). Claude Instant 1.2 is closed, while Kimi-VL is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Instant 1.2 and Kimi-VL don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.