Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 100k | 1M |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 15% |
HumanEvalFunction synthesis — 164 small Python problems: the AI is given a function's description and has to write the working function. This was the coding benchmark of the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 era, before the field moved to fixing real bugs in real repositories. Higher is better. | 58.7% | — |
GSM8KGrade-school math — Grade-school maths word problems that take a few steps of arithmetic to work through. It separated the models of 2022 and 2023 sharply, then saturated. One caveat on the historical numbers: OpenAI included part of the GSM8K training set in GPT-4's pre-training mix, so GPT-4's score is not a clean few-shot result. Higher is better. | 86.7% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | |
| Release date | Aug 9 2023 | Jan 30 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude Instant 1.2vsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 2.0 FlashvsGPT-6.1 SolClaude Instant 1.2vsMuse Spark OpenGemini 2.0 FlashvsMuse Spark OpenClaude Instant 1.2vsGrok 4.7Gemini 2.0 FlashvsGrok 4.7Claude Instant 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemini 2.0 FlashvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude Instant 1.2vsMistral Large 4Gemini 2.0 FlashvsMistral Large 4Claude Instant 1.2vsKimi K3Gemini 2.0 FlashvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Claude Instant 1.2 and Gemini 2.0 Flash don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude Instant 1.2 shipped 540 days before Gemini 2.0 Flash, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 100k (Claude Instant 1.2) vs 1M (Gemini 2.0 Flash).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Instant 1.2 and Gemini 2.0 Flash don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.