Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus — side-by-side specs.
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Release date | Oct 15 2025 | Sep 22 2025 |
| Model type | — | — |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | — |
Context window | — | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 73.3% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 73% | — |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus shipped 23 days before Claude Haiku 4.5 | |
Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus shipped 23 days before Claude Haiku 4.5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is an open-source / open-weight model; Claude Haiku 4.5 is proprietary.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.