Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 9B/27B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 200k | 8k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.65NextBit |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $0.65NextBit |
| — | $163NextBit · int4 | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 49% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 62.3% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 68% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | |
| Release date | Feb 24 2025 | Jun 27 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3.7 SonnetvsGPT-6.1 SolGemma 2vsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 3.7 SonnetvsMuse Spark OpenGemma 2vsMuse Spark OpenClaude 3.7 SonnetvsGrok 4.7Gemma 2vsGrok 4.7Claude 3.7 SonnetvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemma 2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude 3.7 SonnetvsMistral Large 4Gemma 2vsMistral Large 4Claude 3.7 SonnetvsKimi K3Gemma 2vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Gemma 2 shipped 242 days before Claude 3.7 Sonnet, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (Claude 3.7 Sonnet) vs 8k (Gemma 2). Claude 3.7 Sonnet is closed, while Gemma 2 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 2 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.