Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 6B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 200k | 2k |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 46% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 33.4% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 59.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Z.ai |
| Release date | Jun 20 2024 | Mar 14 2023 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3.5 SonnetvsGPT-6.1 SolChatGLM-6BvsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 3.5 SonnetvsGemini 4 ArgonChatGLM-6BvsGemini 4 ArgonClaude 3.5 SonnetvsMuse Spark OpenChatGLM-6BvsMuse Spark OpenClaude 3.5 SonnetvsGrok 4.7ChatGLM-6BvsGrok 4.7Claude 3.5 SonnetvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017ChatGLM-6BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude 3.5 SonnetvsMistral Large 4ChatGLM-6BvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Claude 3.5 Sonnet and ChatGLM-6B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. ChatGLM-6B shipped 464 days before Claude 3.5 Sonnet, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (Claude 3.5 Sonnet) vs 2k (ChatGLM-6B). Claude 3.5 Sonnet is closed, while ChatGLM-6B is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 3.5 Sonnet and ChatGLM-6B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.