Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek DeepSeek-MoE — side-by-side specs.
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Haiku | DeepSeek DeepSeek-MoE | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Release date | Oct 22 2024 | Jan 9 2024 |
| Model type | — | — |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | — |
Context window | — | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 40.6% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 41.6% | — |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | DeepSeek-MoE shipped 287 days before Claude 3.5 Haiku | |
Claude 3.5 Haiku and DeepSeek-MoE don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek-MoE shipped 287 days before Claude 3.5 Haiku, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek-MoE is an open-source / open-weight model; Claude 3.5 Haiku is proprietary.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 3.5 Haiku and DeepSeek-MoE don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.