Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 200k | 32k |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 40.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Release date | Mar 4 2024 | Jan 28 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3 SonnetvsGPT-6.1 SolQwen2.5-MaxvsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 3 SonnetvsGemini 4 ArgonQwen2.5-MaxvsGemini 4 ArgonClaude 3 SonnetvsMuse Spark OpenQwen2.5-MaxvsMuse Spark OpenClaude 3 SonnetvsGrok 4.7Qwen2.5-MaxvsGrok 4.7Claude 3 SonnetvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen2.5-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude 3 SonnetvsMistral Large 4Qwen2.5-MaxvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Max don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude 3 Sonnet shipped 330 days before Qwen2.5-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (Claude 3 Sonnet) vs 32k (Qwen2.5-Max).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Max don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.