Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 200k | 1M |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 40.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | |
| Release date | Mar 4 2024 | Feb 5 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3 SonnetvsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 3 SonnetvsMuse Spark OpenGemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsMuse Spark OpenClaude 3 SonnetvsGrok 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsGrok 4.7Claude 3 SonnetvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude 3 SonnetvsMistral Large 4Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsMistral Large 4Claude 3 SonnetvsKimi K3Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Claude 3 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude 3 Sonnet shipped 338 days before Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (Claude 3 Sonnet) vs 1M (Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 3 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.