Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 200k | 2M |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 33% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 50.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | SpaceXSI |
| Release date | Mar 4 2024 | Sep 19 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3 OpusvsGPT-6.1 TerraGrok 4 FastvsGPT-6.1 TerraClaude 3 OpusvsGemini 4 CarbonGrok 4 FastvsGemini 4 CarbonClaude 3 OpusvsMuse Spark OpenGrok 4 FastvsMuse Spark OpenClaude 3 OpusvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Grok 4 FastvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude 3 OpusvsMistral Large 4Grok 4 FastvsMistral Large 4Claude 3 OpusvsKimi K3.1 ProGrok 4 FastvsKimi K3.1 ProFrequently asked questions
Claude 3 Opus and Grok 4 Fast don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude 3 Opus shipped 564 days before Grok 4 Fast, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (Claude 3 Opus) vs 2M (Grok 4 Fast).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 3 Opus and Grok 4 Fast don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.