Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 0.5B/1.8B/4B/7B/14B/72B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 200k | 32k |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 33% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 50.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Release date | Mar 4 2024 | Feb 4 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3 OpusvsGPT-6.1 SolQwen1.5vsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 3 OpusvsGemini 4 ArgonQwen1.5vsGemini 4 ArgonClaude 3 OpusvsMuse Spark OpenQwen1.5vsMuse Spark OpenClaude 3 OpusvsGrok 4.7Qwen1.5vsGrok 4.7Claude 3 OpusvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen1.5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude 3 OpusvsMistral Large 4Qwen1.5vsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Claude 3 Opus and Qwen1.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen1.5 shipped 29 days before Claude 3 Opus, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (Claude 3 Opus) vs 32k (Qwen1.5). Claude 3 Opus is closed, while Qwen1.5 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 3 Opus and Qwen1.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.