Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 72B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 200k | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 33% | 60.4% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 50.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | Mar 4 2024 | Jun 17 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3 OpusvsGPT-6.1 SolKimi-DevvsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 3 OpusvsGemini 4 ArgonKimi-DevvsGemini 4 ArgonClaude 3 OpusvsMuse Spark OpenKimi-DevvsMuse Spark OpenClaude 3 OpusvsGrok 4.7Kimi-DevvsGrok 4.7Claude 3 OpusvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Kimi-DevvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude 3 OpusvsMistral Large 4Kimi-DevvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Kimi-Dev leads Claude 3 Opus on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (SWE-Bench Verified). Claude 3 Opus shipped 470 days before Kimi-Dev, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (Claude 3 Opus) vs 128k (Kimi-Dev). Claude 3 Opus is closed, while Kimi-Dev is open weight.
On SWE-Bench Verified, Kimi-Dev leads at 60.4% vs Claude 3 Opus at 33%.