Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 109B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 200k | 10M |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.10DeepInfra |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $0.30DeepInfra |
| — | $35.00DeepInfra · fp8 | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 20% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 33% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 50.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Meta |
| Release date | Mar 4 2024 | Apr 5 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3 OpusvsGPT-6.1 SolLLaMA 4 ScoutvsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 3 OpusvsGemini 4 ArgonLLaMA 4 ScoutvsGemini 4 ArgonClaude 3 OpusvsGrok 4.7LLaMA 4 ScoutvsGrok 4.7Claude 3 OpusvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017LLaMA 4 ScoutvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude 3 OpusvsMistral Large 4LLaMA 4 ScoutvsMistral Large 4Claude 3 OpusvsKimi K3LLaMA 4 ScoutvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Claude 3 Opus and LLaMA 4 Scout don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude 3 Opus shipped 397 days before LLaMA 4 Scout, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (Claude 3 Opus) vs 10M (LLaMA 4 Scout). Claude 3 Opus is closed, while LLaMA 4 Scout is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 3 Opus and LLaMA 4 Scout don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.