Compare AI models
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.25 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $10.00 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.125 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.625Google AI Studio |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $5.00Google AI Studio |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 10% | 20% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 33.3% | 86.4% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 59.6% |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 18.8% |
MMMUMultimodal — Tests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | — | 68% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | |
| Release date | Mar 4 2024 | Mar 25 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3 HaikuvsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 2.5 ProvsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 3 HaikuvsMuse Spark 1.3Gemini 2.5 ProvsMuse Spark 1.3Claude 3 HaikuvsGrok 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProvsGrok 4.7Claude 3 HaikuvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGemini 2.5 ProvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude 3 HaikuvsMistral Large 4Gemini 2.5 ProvsMistral Large 4Claude 3 HaikuvsKimi K3Gemini 2.5 ProvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads Claude 3 Haiku on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (BullshitBench v2, GPQA Diamond). Only Gemini 2.5 Pro has a verified first-party API price: $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude 3 Haiku. Claude 3 Haiku shipped 386 days before Gemini 2.5 Pro, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, Gemini 2.5 Pro leads at 20% vs Claude 3 Haiku at 10%. On GPQA Diamond, Gemini 2.5 Pro leads at 86.4% vs Claude 3 Haiku at 33.3%.