Claude 2.1vsQwen2.5-Coder
Claude 2.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 32B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 200k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.66Cloudflare |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $1.00Cloudflare |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Release date | Nov 21 2023 | Nov 12 2024 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Claude 2.1vsGPT-6 AstraQwen2.5-CodervsGPT-6 AstraClaude 2.1vsGemini 3.8 FlashQwen2.5-CodervsGemini 3.8 FlashClaude 2.1vsMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5-CodervsMuse Spark 1.3Claude 2.1vsGrok 4.6Qwen2.5-CodervsGrok 4.6Claude 2.1vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashQwen2.5-CodervsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude 2.1vsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5-CodervsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
Claude 2.1 and Qwen2.5-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude 2.1 shipped 357 days before Qwen2.5-Coder, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (Claude 2.1) vs 128k (Qwen2.5-Coder). Claude 2.1 is proprietary, while Qwen2.5-Coder is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 2.1 and Qwen2.5-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.