Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 8B/49B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 200k | 128k |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Nov 21 2023 | Mar 18 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 2.1vsGPT-6.1 SolLlama Nemotron (Nano/Super)vsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 2.1vsGemini 4 ArgonLlama Nemotron (Nano/Super)vsGemini 4 ArgonClaude 2.1vsMuse Spark OpenLlama Nemotron (Nano/Super)vsMuse Spark OpenClaude 2.1vsGrok 4.7Llama Nemotron (Nano/Super)vsGrok 4.7Claude 2.1vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Llama Nemotron (Nano/Super)vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude 2.1vsMistral Large 4Llama Nemotron (Nano/Super)vsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Claude 2.1 and Llama Nemotron (Nano/Super) don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude 2.1 shipped 483 days before Llama Nemotron (Nano/Super), so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (Claude 2.1) vs 128k (Llama Nemotron (Nano/Super)). Claude 2.1 is closed, while Llama Nemotron (Nano/Super) is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 2.1 and Llama Nemotron (Nano/Super) don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.