# HealthBench Professional — AI model rankings

Realistic health conversations graded against detailed rubrics written by physicians — can the AI respond the way a careful medical professional would? Higher is better.

7 tracked models have a published HealthBench Professional score. Higher is better. Scores come from published lab reports and benchmark sources; recorded sources appear beside the scores.

## Ranking

| Rank | Model | Developer | Score | Source | Released |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | 63.3% | Lab | Jun 9 2026 |
| 2 | Muse Wonder Full | Meta | 62.3% | Lab | Oct 12 2026 |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | 62.1% | Lab | Sep 1 2026 |
| 4 | Muse Wonder | Meta | 60.5% | Lab | Oct 12 2026 |
| 5 | Claude Opus 5 | Anthropic | 59.8% | Lab | Jul 24 2026 |
| 6 | Grok 4.7 | SpaceXSI | 56.7% | Lab | Sep 21 2026 |
| 7 | Grok 4.6 | SpaceXSI | 48.5% | Lab | Aug 12 2026 |


---

Canonical page: https://aireleasetracker.com/benchmark/healthbench-professional
Site index: https://aireleasetracker.com/llms.txt
Source: AI Release Tracker (https://aireleasetracker.com). Most benchmark scores come from lab launch material; gathered results identify the leaderboard that published them.