# CharXiv Reasoning — AI model rankings

Can the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better.

12 tracked models have a published CharXiv Reasoning score. Higher is better. Scores are as published at each model's release.

## Ranking

| Rank | Model | Developer | Score | Released |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Muse Spark | Meta | 88.9% | Apr 8 2026 |
| 2 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Meta | 88.4% | Jul 9 2026 |
| 2 | Qwen3.8-Max | Qwen | 88.4% | Aug 3 2026 |
| 4 | Kimi K3 | Moonshot AI | 84.8% | Jul 16 2026 |
| 5 | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Google | 84.2% | May 19 2026 |
| 6 | GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | 84.1% | Apr 23 2026 |
| 7 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Google | 83.3% | Feb 19 2026 |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.7 | Anthropic | 82.1% | Apr 16 2026 |
| 9 | Qwen3.5 | Qwen | 80.8% | Feb 16 2026 |
| 10 | Gemini 3.0 Flash | Google | 80.3% | Dec 17 2025 |
| 11 | Qwen3.6 | Qwen | 78% | Apr 16 2026 |
| 12 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Anthropic | 72.4% | Feb 17 2026 |


---

Canonical page: https://aireleasetracker.com/benchmark/charxiv-reasoning
Full dataset: https://aireleasetracker.com/llms-full.txt · JSON: https://aireleasetracker.com/models.json
Source: AI Release Tracker (https://aireleasetracker.com). Benchmark scores are the figures published by the releasing lab at launch.