Compare AI models
These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 49% | — |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 62.3% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 68% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | SpaceXAI |
| Release date | Feb 24 2025 | Aug 23 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3.7 SonnetvsGPT-6.1 SolGrok 2.5vsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 3.7 SonnetvsGemini 4 ArgonGrok 2.5vsGemini 4 ArgonClaude 3.7 SonnetvsMuse Spark 1.3Grok 2.5vsMuse Spark 1.3Claude 3.7 SonnetvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGrok 2.5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude 3.7 SonnetvsMistral Large 4Grok 2.5vsMistral Large 4Claude 3.7 SonnetvsKimi K3Grok 2.5vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Grok 2.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude 3.7 Sonnet shipped 180 days before Grok 2.5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Grok 2.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.