Claude 3.7 SonnetvsLLaMA 3.1
Claude 3.7 Sonnet | LLaMA 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 49% | 14% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 62.3% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 68% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Meta |
| Release date | Feb 24 2025 | Jul 23 2024 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Frequently asked questions
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads LLaMA 3.1 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). LLaMA 3.1 shipped 216 days before Claude 3.7 Sonnet, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is proprietary, while LLaMA 3.1 is open weight.
On BullshitBench v2, Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads at 49% vs LLaMA 3.1 at 14%.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released by Anthropic on Feb 24 2025.
LLaMA 3.1 was released by Meta on Jul 23 2024.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a proprietary model released by Anthropic. LLaMA 3.1 is an open weight model released by Meta.
Other comparisons
Claude 3.7 SonnetvsGPT-5.6-CyberLLaMA 3.1vsGPT-5.6-CyberClaude 3.7 SonnetvsGemini 3.7 FlashLLaMA 3.1vsGemini 3.7 FlashClaude 3.7 SonnetvsGrok 4.6LLaMA 3.1vsGrok 4.6Claude 3.7 SonnetvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813LLaMA 3.1vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Claude 3.7 SonnetvsMistral Medium 3.5LLaMA 3.1vsMistral Medium 3.5Claude 3.7 SonnetvsKimi K3LLaMA 3.1vsKimi K3