Claude 3 OpusvsGPT-5.4-Pro
Claude 3 Opus | GPT-5.4-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $30.00 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $180.00 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $30.00Azure |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $180.00Azure |
| Benchmarks | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 50.4% | 94.4% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 33% | — |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 89.3% |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | — | 58.7% |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 83.3% |
FrontierMath · Tier 1–3Advanced math — Very hard, research-level math problems. Tiers 1–3 are the (still extremely difficult) lower tiers. Higher is better. | — | 50% |
FrontierMath · Tier 4Advanced math — Very hard, research-level math problems. Tier 4 is the hardest — close to what professional research mathematicians tackle. Higher is better. | — | 38% |
GDPval (win/tie rate)Knowledge work — How often the AI's work matches or beats a human expert's on real knowledge-work tasks. Higher is better. | — | 82% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Release date | Mar 4 2024 | Mar 5 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Claude 3 OpusvsGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-5.4-ProvsGemini 3.8 FlashClaude 3 OpusvsMuse Spark 1.3GPT-5.4-ProvsMuse Spark 1.3Claude 3 OpusvsGrok 4.6GPT-5.4-ProvsGrok 4.6Claude 3 OpusvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGPT-5.4-ProvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude 3 OpusvsMistral Medium 3.5GPT-5.4-ProvsMistral Medium 3.5Claude 3 OpusvsKimi K3GPT-5.4-ProvsKimi K3
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.4-Pro leads Claude 3 Opus on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). Only GPT-5.4-Pro has a verified first-party API price: $30.00 per million input tokens and $180.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude 3 Opus. Claude 3 Opus shipped 731 days before GPT-5.4-Pro, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On GPQA Diamond, GPT-5.4-Pro leads at 94.4% vs Claude 3 Opus at 50.4%.