Claude 3 HaikuvsLLaMA 3.1
Claude 3 Haiku | LLaMA 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 10% | 14% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 33.3% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Meta |
| Release date | Mar 4 2024 | Jul 23 2024 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Frequently asked questions
LLaMA 3.1 leads Claude 3 Haiku on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Claude 3 Haiku shipped 141 days before LLaMA 3.1, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Claude 3 Haiku is proprietary, while LLaMA 3.1 is open weight.
On BullshitBench v2, LLaMA 3.1 leads at 14% vs Claude 3 Haiku at 10%.
Claude 3 Haiku was released by Anthropic on Mar 4 2024.
LLaMA 3.1 was released by Meta on Jul 23 2024.
Claude 3 Haiku is a proprietary model released by Anthropic. LLaMA 3.1 is an open weight model released by Meta.
Other comparisons
Claude 3 HaikuvsGPT-5.6-CyberLLaMA 3.1vsGPT-5.6-CyberClaude 3 HaikuvsGemini 3.7 FlashLLaMA 3.1vsGemini 3.7 FlashClaude 3 HaikuvsGrok 4.6LLaMA 3.1vsGrok 4.6Claude 3 HaikuvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813LLaMA 3.1vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Claude 3 HaikuvsMistral Medium 3.5LLaMA 3.1vsMistral Medium 3.5Claude 3 HaikuvsKimi K3LLaMA 3.1vsKimi K3